Feldspars |
|||||||||||||||||
Introduction
Feldspars are the most abundant mineral in the Earth's crust, making up more than 60% of both the continental crust and the oceanic crust. Understanding the relationship between their elastic properties and structure is especially crucial for understanding geophysical observations and for determining which aspects of crustal processes are really recorded by the cation partitioning patterns observed in feldspars. |
|||||||||||||||||
The feldspar structure consists of a three-dimensional framework of strongly-bonded TO4 tetrahedra formed by the sharing of oxygen atoms between tetrahedra with T being dominated by Al3+ and Si4+ in natural feldspars. Low-charge cations M occupy the larger voids in the tetrahedral framework to provide charge balance. Given that the tetrahedral framework of feldspars is truly three-dimensional and has no obvious layering, it is initially very surprising that feldspars respond extremely anisotropically to changes in pressure, temperature and the extra-framework cation. Between 60 and 70% of the volume change of all AlSi3 feldspars, both monoclinic and triclinic, induced by compositional change, temperature and pressure, is accommodated by change in the length of the (100) plane normal. This degree of anisotropy is as great as that of the sheet silicates, where the anisotropy clearly results from the bonding between the layers being significantly weaker than the strong bonding within the layers. But this cannot be the case for feldspars in which the T-O bonds are distributed more or less isotropically. It has long been known that the feldspar structure is relatively soft due to the intrinsic flexibility of the crankshaft chains of tetrahedra within the framework. However, the crankshafts are aligned along [100], so this does not explain the reason why the (100) plane normal exhibits the greatest strains with changes in temperature or extra-framework cation. In this page we describe the results of a project to simulate the structures of feldspars as a network of rigid tetrahedra, analyse the possible deformation mechanisms of the framework and thus show why feldspars are so anisotropic. This work has been published in American Mineralogist by Angel, Sochalski-Kolbus and Tribaudino (2012). The tilted structures were generated from the untilted structure by using utilities within my cifReader program, which can also be used to calculate the tilts from any real feldspar structure. The analysis was aided greatly by the use of the Crystalmaker software to make movies of the simulated structures. Further details are explored in Angel et al. (2013) in European Journal of Mineralogy. The CIFs of the structures discussed in that paper are in the Structure archive page. |
|||||||||||||||||
|